永續森林經營發生的二三事...PEFC 森林經營準則的實務整備(C 9.3 & I 9.3.2)。From the Concepts of Sustainable Forest Management to Reality: Practical Steps for PEFC Forest Management Criteria(C 9.3 & I 9.3.2).

 

PEFC（Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification，森林驗證認可計畫）與FSC (Forest Stewardship Council，森林經營委員會)，同為全球兩大森林驗證系統。全球林業經營者，在追求森林的永續經營上，所採用的經營標準內容，有否差異呢?我們將瞭解PEFC的驗證框架之原則與準則內容，及如何準備PEFC驗證的要求，其他內容請參考https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/。

9. Performance evaluation績效評估

9.3 Management review經營檢視

9.3.2 The standard requires that the outputs of the management review shall include decisions related to continual improvement opportunities and any need for changes to the management system.

9.3.2 該標準要求經營檢視的結果，應包括與持續改進機會和任何對經營系統有必要進行修改的相關決定。

可能資料的整備：

經營檢視的產出應包括關於持續改善機會和經營系統變更需求的決策。意即不僅僅是檢討過去，更重要的是要指出哪些方面需要改進，並提出具體的改善措施為未來制定行動計畫。若發現經營系統存在不足，則應決定是否需要對經營系統進行調整或改進。因此組織應準備以下資料：

1.        經營檢視報告中，指出所發現的改善機會。

2.        提出針對這些機會的具體改善措施或改善計畫，包括:改善目標、責任人、時程、資源需求等。

3.        說明是否有必要對系統進行調整，以及調整的內容。

4.        若有調整，提出經營系統變更紀錄。

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PEFC and FSC are the two biggest names in forest certification. So, what's the difference between these two systems? Are they asking forest managers to do completely different things to get certified? Let's dive into PEFC and see what it takes to get certified. For more information, please refer to https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/.

9. Performance evaluation

9.3.2 The standard requires that the outputs of the management review shall include decisions related to continual improvement opportunities and any need for changes to the management system.

The outputs of the management review should include decisions about opportunities for continuous improvement and the need for changes in the operating system. This means not only reviewing the past, but more importantly, pointing out what needs to be improved and proposing specific improvement measures to develop an action plan for the future. If deficiencies in the management system are found, it should be decided whether the management system needs to be adjusted or improved. Therefore, the organization should prepare the following information:

1.        Identifies the opportunities for improvement identified in the management review.

2.        Propose specific improvement measures or improvement plans for these opportunities, including: improvement goals, responsible persons, timelines, resource requirements, etc.

3.        Explain whether and what adjustments are necessary to the system.

4.     If there is any adjustment, a record of changes to the management system will be submitted.