永續森林經營發生的二三事...PEFC 森林經營準則的實務整備(C 9.1 & I 9.1.4)。From the Concepts of Sustainable Forest Management to Reality: Practical Steps for PEFC Forest Management Criteria(C 9.1 & I 9.1.4).

 

PEFC（Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification，森林驗證認可計畫）與FSC (Forest Stewardship Council，森林經營委員會)，同為全球兩大森林驗證系統。全球林業經營者，在追求森林的永續經營上，所採用的經營標準內容，有否差異呢?我們將瞭解PEFC的驗證框架之原則與準則內容，及如何準備PEFC驗證的要求，其他內容請參考https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/。

9. Performance evaluation績效評估

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation監測、衡量、分析和評估

9.1.4 The working conditions shall be regularly monitored and adapted as necessary.

9.1.4 工作條件應定期監測並根據需要進行調整。

可能資料的整備：

       森林經營單位應定期對工作現場的工作條件進行監測，這包括但不限於安全設施、勞動強度、工作環境等。根據監測結果，及時調整工作條件，以確保工作人員的安全和健康，並提高工作效率。

因此組織應準備以下資料：

1.        提供一份工作條件監測計畫，包括:監測項目、頻率、負責人等。

2.        提供歷次的監測記錄，如安全檢查記錄、勞動強度測量數據、工作環境評估報告等。

3.        提供根據監測結果所採取的改善措施的證據，如增設安全設施、調整工作時間、改善工作環境等。

4.        說明組織如何收集員工對工作條件的意見和建議及應對的措施。

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PEFC and FSC are the two biggest names in forest certification. So, what's the difference between these two systems? Are they asking forest managers to do completely different things to get certified? Let's dive into PEFC and see what it takes to get certified. For more information, please refer to https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/.

9. Performance evaluation

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

9.1.4 The working conditions shall be regularly monitored and adapted as necessary.

Preparation of possible information:

       The forest management unit shall regularly monitor the working conditions at the work site, including but not limited to safety facilities, labor intensity, working environment, etc. Based on the monitoring results, the working conditions are adjusted in a timely manner to ensure the safety and health of the staff and improve the work efficiency. Therefore, the organization should prepare the following data:

1.        Provide monitoring plan related to working conditions, including: monitoring items, frequency, person in charge, etc.

2.        Provide previous monitoring records, such as safety inspection records, labor intensity measurement data, working environment assessment reports, etc.

3.        Provide evidence of improvement measures taken based on the results of monitoring, such as adding safety facilities, adjusting working hours, improving the working environment, etc.

4.    Explain how the organization collects employees' opinions and suggestions on working conditions and what measures are taken to respond to them.