永續森林經營發生的二三事...PEFC 森林經營準則的實務整備(C 10.1 & I 10.1.1)。From the Concepts of Sustainable Forest Management to Reality: Practical Steps for PEFC Forest Management Criteria(C 10.1 & I 10.1.1).

 

PEFC（Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification，森林驗證認可計畫）與FSC (Forest Stewardship Council，森林經營委員會)，同為全球兩大森林驗證系統。全球林業經營者，在追求森林的永續經營上，所採用的經營標準內容，有否差異呢?我們將瞭解PEFC的驗證框架之原則與準則內容，及如何準備PEFC驗證的要求，其他內容請參考https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/。

10. Improvement

10. 改善

10.1. Nonconformity and corrective action of nonconformity:

10.1.1 The standard requires that when a nonconformity occurs, the organization shall:

a) react to the nonconformity and, as applicable:

  1) take action to control and correct it;

  2) deal with the consequences;

b) evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of the nonconformity, in order to prevent recurrence or occurrence elsewhere by:

  1) reviewing the nonconformity;

  2) determining the causes of the nonconformity;

  3) determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur;

c) implement any action needed;

d) review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken;

e) make changes to the management system, if necessary.

10.1 不符合項和糾正措施

10.1.1 當發生不符合項時，組織應：

a) 對不符合項作出反應，並在適用的情況下： 1) 採取行動進行控制和糾正； 2)  處理不符合項的後果；

b) 評估消除不符合項原因的行動需求，以防止其再次發生或在其他地方發生，透過： 1). 審查不符合項； 2). 確定不符合項的原因； 3). 確定是否存在類似的不符合項，或是否可能發生；

c) 實施所需的任何行動；

d) 審查所採取糾正措施的有效性；

e) 必要時對經營系統進行變更。

可能資料的整備：

       當發現不符合項時，組織應採取措施，以控制和糾正問題。不僅要解決眼前的問題，還要找到問題的根本原因，並採取措施防止再次發生。透過不符合項的分析和糾正，持續改進經營系統。因此組織應準備以下資料：

1.        每次發現不符合項時的自我評估報告或內、外稽核報告，包括:不符合項的描述、原因分析、糾正措施和處理情況的評估等。

2.        針對每一個不符合項所採取的糾正措施的記錄，包括:措施的實施情況、效果評估等。

3.        必要時，提供針對不符合項所需進行的經營系統修訂的記錄。

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PEFC and FSC are the two biggest names in forest certification. So, what's the difference between these two systems? Are they asking forest managers to do completely different things to get certified? Let's dive into PEFC and see what it takes to get certified. For more information, please refer to https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/.

10. Improvement

10.1. Nonconformity and corrective action of nonconformity:

10.1.1 The standard requires that when a nonconformity occurs, the organization shall:

a) react to the nonconformity and, as applicable:

  1) take action to control and correct it;

  2) deal with the consequences;

b) evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of the nonconformity, in order to prevent recurrence or occurrence elsewhere by:

  1) reviewing the nonconformity;

  2) determining the causes of the nonconformity;

  3) determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur;

c) implement any action needed;

d) review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken;

e) make changes to the management system, if necessary.

Preparation of possible information:

       When a non-conformance is discovered, the organization should take action to control and correct the problem. It is important not only to solve the problem, but also to find the root cause of the problem and take steps to prevent it from happening again. Continuously improve the management system through the analysis and correction of non-conformities. Therefore, the organization should prepare the following information:

1.        Self-assessment report or internal and external audit report when each non-conformity is found, including: description of the non-conformity, analysis of the causes, evaluation of corrective actions and treatment, etc.

2.        A record of the corrective actions taken for each non-conformity, including: the implementation of the measures, the evaluation of the effects, etc.

3.     A record of the management system revisions required for non-conformities (if necessary)