PEFC(Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification,森林驗證認可計畫)與FSC (Forest Stewardship Council,森林經營委員會),同為全球兩大森林驗證系統。全球林業經營者,在追求森林的永續經營上,所採用的經營標準內容,有否差異呢?我們將瞭解PEFC的驗證框架之原則與準則內容,及如何準備PEFC驗證的要求,其他內容請參考https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/。
8. Operation運營
8.6 Maintenance or appropriate enhancement of socio-economic functions
and conditions
8.6維護或適當增強社會經濟功能和條件
8.6.1 Forest management planning shall aim to respect all socio-economic
functions of forests.
8.6.1 森林經營規劃應旨在尊重森林的所有社會經濟功能。
可能資料的整備:
森林不僅提供木材,還提供多種社會經濟功能,例如:提供就業機會、提供生態旅遊資源等。因此組織應準備以下資料:
1.
提供對森林的社會、經濟功能進行評估的報告,例如:就業機會、生態旅遊收入等。
2.
提供森林經營計畫,說明如何通過經營活動維護或增強這些社會經濟功能。
3.
提供社區參與計畫,說明如何與當地社區合作,共同制定和實施森林經營計畫。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEFC and FSC are the two biggest names in forest certification. So,
what's the difference between these two systems? Are they asking forest
managers to do completely different things to get certified? Let's dive into
PEFC and see what it takes to get certified. For more information, please refer
to https://sustainableforest.blogspot.com/.
8. Operation
8.6 Maintenance or appropriate enhancement of socio-economic functions
and conditions.
8.6.1 Forest management planning shall aim to respect all socio-economic
functions of forests.
Preparation of possible information:
Forests provide not only
timber, but also a variety of socio-economic functions, such as providing
employment opportunities, providing ecotourism resources, etc.
Therefore, organizations should prepare the following data:
1.
Provide a report that
assesses the social and economic functions of forests, e.g. employment
opportunities, ecotourism income, etc.
2. Provide a forest management plan that explains how these socio-economic functions can be maintained or enhanced through business activities.
3. Provide a community engagement plan that explains how to work with local communities to develop and implement a forest management plan.
沒有留言:
張貼留言